OHP May 2009 Update
MDA Successful in Holding to Principles for Mid-Level Practitioner Legislation
Late last week, the proponents of the Oral Health
Practitioner (OHP) agreed with many of the concerns of the
MDA and relinquished their push for broad-based OHP
legislation. What came out of intense negotiations will be a
new mid-level dental practitioner, called a Dental
Therapist, that reflects MDA membership’s demands for
appropriate training, scope of practice, and supervision in
an effort to alleviate some of Minnesota’s dental access
issues.
While numerous circumstances led to this final outcome,
several occurrences last week led to an agreement on
compromise language.
As we had reported both the OHP and Dental Therapist had
been incorporated into the House Omnibus Licensing bill. We
had been working diligently behind the scenes to take the
OHP language out of the House bill when and if it reached a
full floor for a vote. We were confident that we had the
votes to do this. Last week, when the bill was finally
scheduled for a vote, the author, Representative Cy Thao,
and the many OHP lobbyists realized that we were going to
succeed.
The best move for OHP supporters at that time was to force
the Higher Education Conference Committee to get the House
conferees to accept the Senate language - even though the
House had not voted on the subject. We worked the committee
very hard and had assurances from all of the House
conferees, as well as House leadership, that they would not
accept the language. MDA members actively communicated with
conference committee members and we know that each House
conferee received between 80-100 phone calls from concerned
citizens.
Last week, however, legislative activity and pressure
intensified as the Constitutional deadline for adjournment
approached. The confluence of numerous legislative dynamics
(see below) then led to the development of an agreement
regarding dental therapist legislation. While the end
result is not everything we would want it to be, we truly
believe that we got the best outcome possible.
Week
of May 4-8
Monday
The week started off with 310 letters opposing the OHP
language being delivered to legislators from dentists,
dental hygienists, and dental assistants that had attended
the Star of the North meeting.
House leadership was getting very nervous about the tone of
the campaign and wanted both sides to work out their
differences. We were called to a meeting that evening where
legislators representing both sides attempted to negotiate a
compromise:
Dental Therapist supporters Oral
Health Practitioner supporters
Rep. Kim Norton Rep. Cy
Thao
Sen. Yvonne Prettner Solon Sen. Ann Lynch
(invited but did not attend)
Rep. Tina Liebling Rep. Erin
Murphy
Rep. Loren Solberg Sen. Sandy
Pappas
Dean Patrick Lloyd (U of M) Michael
Scandrett (Safety Net Coalition)
At the end of the meeting, no agreements were reached and in
fact, relations may have grown further apart.
Tuesday
Speaker of the House Margaret Anderson Kelliher demanded
that a second meeting be held and that both sides work
harder for an agreement. Rather than send lobbyists into
the meeting, it was agreed that both sides would be
represented by dentists and legislators.
Dental Therapist supporters Oral
Health Practitioner supporters
Rep. Kim Norton Rep. Cy
Thao
Rep. Loren Solberg Dr. Craig
Amundson
Dr. Jamie Sledd Dr. Pat
Tarren
Dr. Judith Buchanan (U of M)
After this meeting there was still no progress made.
Wednesday
On Wednesday, the Senate Conferees made an offer in the
Higher Ed Conference Committee that asked that the House
accept the Senate OHP language. At that time, the House
members were so infuriated by the Senate offer (because of
other things included in the offer) that they immediately
adjourned the meeting.
At that time, a representative of the Safety Net Coalition
independently proposed compromise language that
substantially changed the OHP proposal. The MDA and the
School of Dentistry then developed a counter-proposal for
Representative Kim Norton to bring to House leadership to
show that good faith efforts were being made.
Thursday
In a surprise move on Thursday, Representative Tom Rukavina,
co-chair of the Higher Ed Conference Committee, came back
with a House counter-offer to the Senate. In his surprise
move, Representative Rukavina and the House conferees
acceded to the Senate position and agreed to accept the
OHP/DT language as part of the bill! Our lobbyists talked
with him and asked why he had “sold us out.” He admitted
that it was more to get negotiations moving faster and
stated that we better work something out within the next 24
hours or it would stay in the bill.
We quickly went back to House leadership and were assured
that there was no way this was going to happen unless there
was an agreement from all sides. What they really wanted
was to avoid a House floor fight that would show the
division of the House Democrats on the subject. In fact,
our lobbyists had also been working with the House
Republicans to offer a bevy of amendments to substantially
alter the OHP language.
Discussions between the MDA and the Safety Net Coalition
occurred throughout the afternoon and resulted in a proposal
that addressed key MDA concerns. The offer was vetted with
the MDA leadership and the interested parties from the other
side. The proposal was then sent to Senate Counsel to be
drafted as an amendment to the Higher Education Bill.
Friday
In the Conference Committee, Rep. Rukavina admitted that he
would likely have to take the language out. Senator Lynch
gave a very emotional speech about how concerned she was
about all of the ads that were being run. Rukavina’s
response was that he was not concerned about those that were
trying to twist his arm, but was concerned about passing bad
legislation. Rukavina then recessed the meeting and stated
that the conference committee would meet again when the
amendment was ready. He specifically pointed out our
lobbyists in the room and stated, “The train has left the
station. You better get the negotiating done quickly or you
will be stuck with the OHP language.”
We received the language at approximately 2:35 on Friday
afternoon and the Conference Committee convened ten minutes
later. The amendment was offered, somewhat grudgingly, by
Senator Lynch and explained by MDA lobbyist Dominic Sposeto
and the representative from the Safety Net Coalition. After
a few brief questions, the compromise amendment was adopted
and incorporated into the Higher Ed bill. Since Conference
Committee bills are not allowed on the floor, the Higher
Education bill language is what the bill will look like
when it passes.
Afterwards, Senator Lynch strongly expressed her
disappointment with many of the changes that were made. She
was very upset that the language had taken on a completely
different look that was not her original legislation or
intent.
This week, the Higher Education Conference Committee
wrapped up its work and sent the bill to the Senate and
House floors for approval. We understand that the Governor
does not have major problems with this bill and is expected
to sign it.
________________________________________
The new mid-level provider would be called a dental
therapist. There would be another level of
training/experience to qualify as an advanced dental
therapist.
- A Dental Therapist (DT) will have to work under the indirect (onsite) supervision of a dentist.
- An Advanced Dental Therapist (ADT) will need additional education (beyond that of a dental therapist) in order to treat a patient under general supervision.
- The supervising dentist will need to approve surgical procedures for each individual patient prior to treatment by an Advanced Dental Therapist.
- Training for these programs can be done by educational institutions that are either accredited or approved by the Minnesota Board of Dentistry.
- Neither the DT nor ADT will be authorized to prescribe medications.
Special thanks go out to:
- Our authors, Representative Kim Norton and Senator Yvonne Prettner Solon, who championed our cause and believed that the MDA and U of M had the best program.
- Representative Loren Solberg who helped to broker the best deal possible.
- The MDA Membership. Legislators were constantly commenting on hearing from their dentists. Without your calls, e-mails and visits during Dental Day at the Capitol, we would not have been successful.
- Our lobbying team of Dominic Sposeto, Tom Day and Mary Daugherty Gilbert, led by Executive Director Dick Diercks, spent days, nights and weekends at the Capitol working on the MDA’s behalf. In addition, thank you to Tom Poul and Nancy Haas, from the lobbying firm of Messerli & Kramer.
- The University of Minnesota School of Dentistry. In particular, to the Dean of the School, Dr. Patrick Lloyd, and the U’s lobbyist Marty McDonough.
Dental Programs Avoid Budget Cuts Thus Far
If this past week wasn’t crazy enough, during the whole
time, the Health and Human Services Committee was also
meeting to resolve differences between the House and Senate
language. If you remember, Governor Tim Pawlenty had
proposed eliminating the Critical Access Dental Provider
Program, eliminating adult dental care for all program
participants, and eliminating the Health Care Access fund
(but not the provider tax). In addition different
legislators had offered increasing the provider tax to as
high as five percent and allowing the health plans to
terminate dentists from the Critical Access Program.
The HHS Conference Committee wrapped up its business at 6:00
am on Sunday morning - Mothers Day! We are very pleased to
report that we were extremely successful in:
- Saving the Critical Access Dental Provider Program
- Saving adult dental care - although the benefits will be limited
- Saving the Health Care Access fund
- Preventing the Provider Tax from being increased
- Preventing health plans from having the ability to terminate dentists from the Critical Access Dental Provider Program
The bill passed out of the full House and Senate was
immediately vetoed by Governor Pawlenty. The Conference
Committee is already meeting to come up with “Round 2” of an
Omnibus HHS Bill. We will keep you apprised of this action.
